Members of Ateret Cohanim took possession of the Petra Hotel near the Jaffa Gate in the Old City of Jerusalem on Sunday morning after an 18 year legal battle between the Jewish association and the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem, Ha’aretz reported.
In June 2019, The Jerusalem District Court ruled that Ateret Cohanim had legal rights over three large areas in strategic locations in the Old City of Jerusalem, currently populated by mostly Arab residents.
In 2004, three foreign real estate companies signed under a veil of great secrecy three different contracts with the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate which owned the assets.
In the first transaction, Berisford Investments Limited purchased a lease for the Petra Hotel, a four-story building located at Omar Ibn al-Hatab Square, between the Jaffa Gate and the Arab market. It is a 99-year lease, with an option for another 99 years.
In the second transaction, under similar lease terms, Richards Marketing Corporation acquired the adjacent two-story Imperial Hotel, with the stores below.
In the third transaction, Gallow Global Limited acquired the rights to a structure called Beit Azmiya, in the Bab a-Khuta neighborhood of the Old City.
Ateret Cohanim, which deals with the redemption of land in Jerusalem, is credited with locating the assets and negotiating for their purchase.
In recent years, Ateret Cohanim has been waging a legal battle against the Kirsch family, which rents the Petra Hotel from the patriarchy and runs it. On Sunday morning, the association’s officials, accompanied by police, entered the first floor of the hotel.
The Church, which was humiliated by the revelations of the three spectacular purchases, initially denied they had ever been signed by Patriarch Irenaios Skopelitis and that any monetary consideration was received in exchange for them.
Then the same church claimed the director of its finance department had acted without authorization when he made the sale.
Judge Gila Kanfi-Steinitz, deputy head of the Jerusalem district court, ruled in 2019 that there is no dispute that Irenaios had the authority to enter into agreements on behalf of the Church and that there is no doubt that the director of the church’s finance department who signed the agreements acted as his proxy.
Judge Knafi-Steinitz also ruled that “the plaintiffs did not provide sufficient proof on the required level to their claims of bribery or corruption that underlie the transactions. Therefore, the result is that it is necessary to determine that the three transactions are valid,” she concluded.
The judge also ruled that “there is no disputing the fact that the plaintiffs were paid the full consideration for the transactions.”
READ MORE: New Israel: Avri Steiner identifies Greek Islands as “Safe Haven for the Jewish People.”
Giannis Kostakis was born in Athens, Greece, and is a distinguished Paralympic swimmer known for…
Princess Beatrice and her husband, Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi, have joyfully announced a Greek name for…
Prince Nikolaos, the third child of Greece’s last King and Queen, Constantine II and Anne-Marie,…
Hidden forces shaping human behaviour: 20 fascinating psychological phenomena
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant global health concern, accounting for up to 20%…
Christopher Nolan, with an all-star cast, is embarking on what may be the most ambitious…